Search

Consulting Tel.:0532-83899763
Customer Service Tel.:0532-83887399

Message Board

Add:7th Floor of Jinyi Building, 129 Yan'an Third Road,

          Shinan District, Qingdao City, Shandong Province

E-mail:cglaw@126.com


©2019 Chenggong Law Firmpage copyright                                                                                                                                                                                鲁ICP备10210321号  Powered by www.300.cn

Ingenious Law Firm, High-quality Lawyer, Provide One-stop Law Services for Clients

 Service Area

No content information display available
Please add data record on website background.

Lawyer

>
>
Maritime Affairs

Maritime Affairs

Page view
The professional legal services available include, but are not limited to:
 
Ship financing agent, maritime dispute litigation agent, maritime commerce dispute litigation agent, marine insurance dispute litigation agent, port engineering dispute litigation agent.
 
Typical Cases
It has acted for WU X to sue Qingdao X International Ship Management Co., Ltd. for disputes over seafarers' labor contracts. After the evidential hearing of the Qingdao Maritime Court, Shandong Higher People's Court and Supreme People's Court, the approval rules of seafarers' labor contracts were established.
It has acted for the case of ship owner's arrears of crew's wages. In this case, the state successfully auctioned bulk carriers containing solid waste prohibited by the state for the first time in recent years, which effectively safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of the crew.
It has acted for Qingdao X International Logistics Co., Ltd. to sue Shanxi X International Trade Co., Ltd. for disputes over freight forwarding contracts. In the absence of effective evidence, we prompted both parties to reach a mediation, which saved millions of economic losses for the parties.
It acted for Rongcheng X Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. to sue FANG X, SUN X and other two people for marine development and utilization disputes, and the court rejected the company's claim for personal compensation for millions of breeding losses.